Butts v. Meachum

553 A.2d 636, 17 Conn. App. 826, 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 45
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedFebruary 1, 1989
Docket6638
StatusPublished

This text of 553 A.2d 636 (Butts v. Meachum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Butts v. Meachum, 553 A.2d 636, 17 Conn. App. 826, 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 45 (Colo. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal from the trial court’s granting of a petition for habeas corpus presents the same question as that decided in Plourde v. Liburdi, 207 Conn. 412, 540 A.2d 1054 (1988), which held that a person who has been sentenced to a mandatory minimum sentence under General Statutes § 14-227a (h), is not entitled to “good time credit” pursuant to General Statutes § 18-7a (c)1 or “employment credit” pursuant to General Statutes § 18-98a.2 In the present case, decided before Plourde, the trial court concluded that the petitioner, sentenced to a mandatory minimum sentence pursuant to General Statutes § 14-227a (h),3 was entitled to such credits.

The ruling in Plourde requires reversal of the trial court’s judgment which granted the petition for writ of habeas corpus.

[828]*828There is error, the judgment is set aside and the case is remanded with direction to deny the petition for writ of habeas corpus.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Plourde v. Liburdi
540 A.2d 1054 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
553 A.2d 636, 17 Conn. App. 826, 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butts-v-meachum-connappct-1989.