Butts v. Marseille

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Butts v. Marseille

264 A.D.2d 797, 695 N.Y.S.2d 704, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9410

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 27, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 264 A.D.2d 797 (Butts v. Marseille) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Butts v. Marseille, 264 A.D.2d 797, 695 N.Y.S.2d 704, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9410 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated September 24, 1998, as upon re-argument, adhered to its prior determination in an order dated June 15, 1998, denying their motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiffs failed to establish their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly adhered to its prior determination denying their motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557). S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated September 24, 1998, as upon re-argument, adhered to its prior determination in an order dated June 15, 1998, denying their motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiffs failed to establish their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly adhered to its prior determination denying their motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557). S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 A.D.2d 797, 695 N.Y.S.2d 704, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butts-v-marseille-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack