Butts v. Drake

Superior Court of North Carolina

Butts v. Drake

3 N.C. 102

DecidedApril 15, 1799

StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.C. 102 (Butts v. Drake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Butts v. Drake, 3 N.C. 102 (N.C. Ct. App. 1799).

Pincite

Opinion

"C’JECTMENT. The jury retired and found a verdict; but whilst they were out the court adjourned, and they separated without delivering their verdict to one of the Judges ; but delivered it next morning in court, and it was entered debene esse: And alter some days consideration, Moore, Judge, decided that it was a good verdict notwithstanding the objection, that it should have been delivered to a Judge before the jury separated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

"C’JECTMENT. The jury retired and found a verdict; but whilst they were out the court adjourned, and they separated without delivering their verdict to one of the Judges ; but delivered it next morning in court, and it was entered debene esse: And alter some days consideration, Moore, Judge, decided that it was a good verdict notwithstanding the objection, that it should have been delivered to a Judge before the jury separated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 N.C. 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butts-v-drake-ncsuperct-1799.