Butts v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Fourth Circuit

Butts v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

523 F. App'x 239

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 5, 2013

DocketNo. 13-6466

StatusPublished

This text of 523 F. App'x 239 (Butts v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Butts v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 523 F. App'x 239 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Wayne D. Butts appeals the district court’s order characterizing his petition for a writ of execution as a petition for a writ of mandamus and denying relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Butts v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 2:13-cv-00069-MSD-TEM (E.D.Va. Mar. 1, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Wayne D. Butts appeals the district court’s order characterizing his petition for a writ of execution as a petition for a writ of mandamus and denying relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Butts v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 2:13-cv-00069-MSD-TEM (E.D.Va. Mar. 1, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

523 F. App'x 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butts-v-commissioner-of-social-security-administration-ca4-2013.