Butts v. Cherry
This text of 137 F. App'x 566 (Butts v. Cherry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Wayne Douglas Butts appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See Slade v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail, 407 F.3d 243 (4th Cir.2005); Waters v. Bass, 304 F.Supp.2d 802 (E.D.Va.2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion to forward the complete record on appeal to the United States Supreme Court is denied.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
137 F. App'x 566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butts-v-cherry-ca4-2005.