Butts v. Babineau

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 16, 2009
Docket08-7919
StatusUnpublished

This text of Butts v. Babineau (Butts v. Babineau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Butts v. Babineau, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7919

LORENZO BUTTS, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JON MICHAEL BABINEAU, Attorney,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:08-cv-00309-JBF-TEM)

Submitted: March 12, 2009 Decided: March 16, 2009

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lorenzo Butts, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Lorenzo Butts appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 (2006), and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed.

Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Butts v. Babineau,

No. 2:08-cv-00309-JBF-TEM (E.D. Va. July 28, 2008). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Butts v. Babineau, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butts-v-babineau-ca4-2009.