Butts v. Babineau
This text of Butts v. Babineau (Butts v. Babineau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7919
LORENZO BUTTS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JON MICHAEL BABINEAU, Attorney,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:08-cv-00309-JBF-TEM)
Submitted: March 12, 2009 Decided: March 16, 2009
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lorenzo Butts, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Lorenzo Butts appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2006), and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed.
Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Butts v. Babineau,
No. 2:08-cv-00309-JBF-TEM (E.D. Va. July 28, 2008). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Butts v. Babineau, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butts-v-babineau-ca4-2009.