Buttrum v. Fox Garage Co.

167 S.E. 213, 46 Ga. App. 173, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 94
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 22, 1932·No. 22494·Published

Opinion

Hooper, J.

Tlie only issue in this ease was one of fact; the jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff; the defendant made a motion for a new trial, which was overruled, and upon this ruling he assigns error. The evidence, though conflicting, fully authorized the verdict, no error of law is shown, and the motion for a new trial, based on the general grounds only, was properly overruled. Greer v. State, 6 Ga. App. 785 (65 S. E. 802); Toole v. Jones, 19 Ga. App. 24 (90 S. E. 732).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Buttrum v. Fox Garage Co., 167 S.E. 213, 46 Ga. App. 173, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 94 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

167 S.E. 213 (Buttrum v. Fox Garage Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Greer v. State
65 S.E. 802 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Toole v. Jones
90 S.E. 732 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)