Buttrum v. Fox Garage Co.

167 S.E. 213, 46 Ga. App. 173, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 94
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 22, 1932
Docket22494
StatusPublished

This text of 167 S.E. 213 (Buttrum v. Fox Garage Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buttrum v. Fox Garage Co., 167 S.E. 213, 46 Ga. App. 173, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 94 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Hooper, J.

Tlie only issue in this ease was one of fact; the jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff; the defendant made a motion for a new trial, which was overruled, and upon this ruling he assigns error. The evidence, though conflicting, fully authorized the verdict, no error of law is shown, and the motion for a new trial, based on the general grounds only, was properly overruled. Greer v. State, 6 Ga. App. 785 (65 S. E. 802); Toole v. Jones, 19 Ga. App. 24 (90 S. E. 732).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Greer v. State
65 S.E. 802 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Toole v. Jones
90 S.E. 732 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 S.E. 213, 46 Ga. App. 173, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buttrum-v-fox-garage-co-gactapp-1932.