Buttross v. Great Lakes Insurance SE

District Court, N.D. Texas·Decided November 7, 2022·No. 1:22-cv-00086·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ABILENE DIVISION DAVID BUTTROSS d/b/a FL20, INC., Plaintiff, v. No. 1:22-CV-086-H-BU GREAT LAKES INSURANCE SE, et al., Defendants. ORDER The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation (FCR) that defendant Gloria Valdez’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (Dkt. No. 6) be granted. Dkt. No. 11. No objections were filed. The District Court has reviewed the FCR for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Briefly, the Court confirms its jurisdiction. The FCR notes the motion’s failure to address improper joinder and subject matter jurisdiction but refrained from a full-scale analysis. Dkt. No. 11 at6n.4. The Fifth Circuit very recently decided Advanced Indicator, in which it expressly held that, as long as the Section 542.006 election is made before removal, an in-state agent subject to such an election is improperly joined. Advanced Indicator and Mfg., Inc. v. Acadia Ins. Co., 50 F. 4th 469, 474 (Sth Cir. Oct. 3, 2022). Because this case is squarely within the facts of Advanced Indicator, the Court has jurisdiction. The FCR is accepted and adopted.

So ordered on November 4 , 2022.

JAME ESLEY HENDRIX UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Buttross v. Great Lakes Insurance SE, (N.D. Tex. 2022).

Buttross v. Great Lakes Insurance SE (Buttross v. Great Lakes Insurance SE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adv Indicator v. Acadia Ins
50 F.4th 469 (Fifth Circuit, 2022)