Buttrill Guano Co. v. Curry
92 S.E. 521, 147 Ga. 11, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 14
Opinion
As an abstract principle of law it is error, on the trial of an issue where fraud is charged by a creditor as to a transaction between husband and wife, for the trial judge to omit to instruct the jury that the onus is on the husband and wife to show that the transaction was fair. In this case the failure to so charge is harmless, because the verdict rendered by the jury was demanded by the evidence. None of the assignments of error require the grant of a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Buttrill Guano Co. v. Curry, 92 S.E. 521, 147 Ga. 11, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 14 (Ga. 1917).
92 S.E. 521 (Buttrill Guano Co. v. Curry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dwight v. Acme Lumber & Supply Co.
6 S.E.2d 586 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)