Buttrill Guano Co. v. Curry

92 S.E. 521, 147 Ga. 11, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 14
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 16, 1917·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

As an abstract principle of law it is error, on the trial of an issue where fraud is charged by a creditor as to a transaction between husband and wife, for the trial judge to omit to instruct the jury that the onus is on the husband and wife to show that the transaction was fair. In this case the failure to so charge is harmless, because the verdict rendered by the jury was demanded by the evidence. None of the assignments of error require the grant of a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

■ All the. Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Buttrill Guano Co. v. Curry, 92 S.E. 521, 147 Ga. 11, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 14 (Ga. 1917).

92 S.E. 521 (Buttrill Guano Co. v. Curry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dwight v. Acme Lumber & Supply Co.
6 S.E.2d 586 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)