Buttrick v. Allen

8 Mass. 273
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1811
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 8 Mass. 273 (Buttrick v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buttrick v. Allen, 8 Mass. 273 (Mass. 1811).

Opinion

* By the Court.

The verification of the record is sufficient for the purpose for which it is produced. There is no doubt that assumpsit lies upon a foreign judgment; but the judgment is no more than prima facie evidence, and the defendant has all the benefits he would be entitled to in an action upon he original cause. It was competent to the defendant to prove in the trial of the present action that he was not within the jurisdiction of the foreign court, and its effect would be avoided. In the case cited from East’s reports, the defendant Rucker is called of the city of London, and it does not appear that he was ever in the island of Tobago, and the notice plainly shows that he was not then to be found there; but in the record before us, the defendant is named as “ late of Waltham, in the commonwealth of Massachusetts, but now of Shelburne,” &c.

Judgment on the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Hoffman
665 F. Supp. 73 (D. Massachusetts, 1987)
Svenska Handelsbanken v. Carlson
258 F. Supp. 448 (D. Massachusetts, 1966)
Lowry v. Greenlay
1 Mass. App. Div. 320 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1936)
Tourigny v. Houle
34 A. 158 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1896)
McMullen v. Richie
41 F. 502 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio, 1890)
Wilbur v. Abbot
60 N.H. 40 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1880)
Thompson v. Mason
4 Ill. App. 452 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1879)
Kingman v. Cowles
103 Mass. 283 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1869)
Haggerty v. Amory
89 Mass. 458 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1863)
Holmes v. Smith
49 Me. 242 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1861)
Taylor v. Barron
30 N.H. 78 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1855)
Pickard v. Bailey
26 N.H. 152 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1852)
Burnham v. Webster
4 F. Cas. 781 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine, 1846)
Bimeler v. Dawson
5 Scam. 535 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1843)
Russell v. Perry
14 N.H. 152 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1843)
Trader v. McKee
2 Ill. 558 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1839)
Andrews v. Herriot
4 Cow. 508 (New York Supreme Court, 1825)
Gerault v. Anderson
1 Miss. 30 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1818)
Vandenheuvel v. United Insurance
2 Johns. Cas. 127 (New York Supreme Court, 1801)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Mass. 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buttrick-v-allen-mass-1811.