Buttman v. Dennett
30 N.Y.S. 247, 9 Misc. 462, 61 N.Y. St. Rep. 89
Opinion
We think that a restaurant keeper, in whose custody wraps and other articles of wearing apparel have been temporarily placed for safe-keeping, is liable as a bailee, under the rule laid down in Bunnell v. Stern, 122 N. Y. 539, 25 N. E. 910, and Bird v. Everard (Com. Pl. N. Y.) 23 N. Y. Supp. 1008; and that the judgment must therefore be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Buttman v. Dennett, 30 N.Y.S. 247, 9 Misc. 462, 61 N.Y. St. Rep. 89 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).
30 N.Y.S. 247 (Buttman v. Dennett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Robin v. Colaizzi
101 Misc. 298 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)
Wentworth v. Riggs
79 Misc. 400 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)
Simpson v. Rourke
34 N.Y.S. 11 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1895)