Buttlar v. Buttlar

63 A. 1118, 67 N.J. Eq. 729, 1 Robb. 729, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 223

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided December 9, 1904·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pitney in the court below.

For affirmance — Dixon, Gaebison, Poet, Pitney, Bogeet, Veedenbuegh, Vboom, Geeen, Geay — 9.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Buttlar v. Buttlar, 63 A. 1118, 67 N.J. Eq. 729, 1 Robb. 729, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 223 (N.J. 1904).

Pincite

63 A. 1118 (Buttlar v. Buttlar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.