Buttfield v. United States

192 U.S. 499, 24 S. Ct. 356, 48 L. Ed. 537, 1904 U.S. LEXIS 967
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 23, 1904
Docket516
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 192 U.S. 499 (Buttfield v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buttfield v. United States, 192 U.S. 499, 24 S. Ct. 356, 48 L. Ed. 537, 1904 U.S. LEXIS 967 (1904).

Opinion

Mr. Justice White

delivered' the opinion of the court.

This was a proceeding for the condemnation of seven pack *500 ages of tea, which had been reimported after export from this counti-y upon a final rejection of the tea by the board of general appraisers as not entitled to admission into the United States for consumption under the tea inspection act of March 2, 1897. Buttfield appeared as claimant, and a demurrer filed on his behalf to the information was overruled. ’ The claimant failing to-plead further, a final decree and judgment of forfeiture was entered. A reversal is asked upon the sole ground that the act of March 2, 1897, referred to, is repugnant to the Constitution of the United States. Upon the authority of Buttfield v. Stranahan just decided, the judgment below is

Affirmed.'

Mr. Justice Brewer and Mr. Justice Brown took no part in.the decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Twenty Chests of Tea
208 F. 89 (N.D. New York, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 U.S. 499, 24 S. Ct. 356, 48 L. Ed. 537, 1904 U.S. LEXIS 967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buttfield-v-united-states-scotus-1904.