Butterworth v. Soper
13 Johns. 443
This text of 13 Johns. 443 (Butterworth v. Soper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Butterworth v. Soper, 13 Johns. 443 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1816).
Opinion
There is no error, and the judgment must be affirmed. The statute
Judgment affirmed.
(See act.for the more easy pleading in certain suits, N. R. L. 155. sect. 1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Richardson v. Huston
74 N.W. 234 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1898)
Guiterman v. Liverpool, New York & Philadelphia Mail Steamship Co.
9 Daly 119 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1879)
Martin v. Clark
16 F. Cas. 892 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Arkansas, 1834)
Stewart v. Treasurer
4 Ohio 88 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1829)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
13 Johns. 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butterworth-v-soper-nysupct-1816.