Butternuts & Oxford Turnpike Co. v. North

1 Hill & Den. 518
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 15, 1841
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Hill & Den. 518 (Butternuts & Oxford Turnpike Co. v. North) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Butternuts & Oxford Turnpike Co. v. North, 1 Hill & Den. 518 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1841).

Opinion

By the Court, Cowen, J.

Subscriptions for stock under the turnpike act, (1 R. 8. 581, 2d. ed.) to which the plaintiffs were subject, (8ess. L. of 1834, p. 137,) must be absolute. This act confers no power to make conditions; and, to allow such a thing, would be contrary to public policy. Divers men would perhaps have their divers routes, and endeavor improperly to influence the course of the road. If the general subscription should contain a condition of this kind, there would be no stockholders till the road should be laid out accordingly; and separate subscriptions containing various conditions, might work a fraud upon those who subscribe absolutely. The court below decided correctly.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Hill & Den. 518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butternuts-oxford-turnpike-co-v-north-nysupct-1841.