Butterman v. RH MACY & CO., INC.

269 N.E.2d 822, 28 N.Y.2d 722

New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 7, 1971·Published

Opinion

28 N.Y.2d 722 (1971)

Jay Butterman, an Infant, by Louis Butterman, His Father, et al., Appellants-Respondents,
v.
R. H. Macy & Company, Inc., Respondent-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued February 24, 1971. Decided April 7, 1971.

Cyrus M. Diamond for appellants-respondents.

Warren A. Herland and John P. Walsh for respondent-appellant.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.

Order affirmed, without costs. Question certified answered in the affirmative. No opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

28 N.Y.2d 722 (1971)

Jay Butterman, an Infant, by Louis Butterman, His Father, et al., Appellants-Respondents,
v.
R. H. Macy & Company, Inc., Respondent-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued February 24, 1971. Decided April 7, 1971.

Cyrus M. Diamond for appellants-respondents.

Warren A. Herland and John P. Walsh for respondent-appellant.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.

Order affirmed, without costs. Question certified answered in the affirmative. No opinion.

Butterman v. RH MACY & CO., INC., 269 N.E.2d 822, 28 N.Y.2d 722 (N.Y. 1971).

Pincite

269 N.E.2d 822 (Butterman v. RH MACY & CO., INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Butterman v. R. H. Macy & Co.

269 N.E.2d 822 (New York Court of Appeals, 1971)