Butterman v. RH MACY & CO., INC.
269 N.E.2d 822, 28 N.Y.2d 722
This text of 269 N.E.2d 822 (Butterman v. RH MACY & CO., INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Butterman v. RH MACY & CO., INC., 269 N.E.2d 822, 28 N.Y.2d 722 (N.Y. 1971).
Opinion
Jay Butterman, an Infant, by Louis Butterman, His Father, et al., Appellants-Respondents,
v.
R. H. Macy & Company, Inc., Respondent-Appellant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Cyrus M. Diamond for appellants-respondents.
Warren A. Herland and John P. Walsh for respondent-appellant.
Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.
Order affirmed, without costs. Question certified answered in the affirmative. No opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Butterman v. R. H. Macy & Co.
269 N.E.2d 822 (New York Court of Appeals, 1971)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
269 N.E.2d 822, 28 N.Y.2d 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butterman-v-rh-macy-co-inc-ny-1971.