Butterman v. D. L. W. R. R. Co.
This text of 12 A.2d 18 (Butterman v. D. L. W. R. R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Leaving a train at the regular stopping place at a station with which she was familiar, plaintiff stepped from the car to a stepping box of standard construction and, while leaving the box or after she had left it, fell and was injured. The weather was sleeting; there was no evidence of inadequate lighting, defect in the *Page 466
box, or that it stood on ground that was not level. A brakeman stood on one side of the box and a chauffeur, who had come to receive plaintiff, stood on the other, the chauffeur helping her down by having, as she testified, "his hand on my elbow"; she thought the box "tipped" or "slipped back on the sleet". The learned court below concluded there was no evidence of negligence on the part of defendant; nothing to show that the box was misplaced or was defective, or that the injury resulted from an appliance of transportation. We agree with that conclusion. Compare Dixon v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.,
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 A.2d 18, 337 Pa. 465, 1940 Pa. LEXIS 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butterman-v-d-l-w-r-r-co-pa-1940.