Home/New York Court of Appeals/Butterfield v. . the State of New York

Butterfield v. . the State of New York

117 N.E. 940, 221 N.Y. 701, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1573
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 13, 1917·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from should be reversed, and the determination of the Court of Claims ' affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, upon the authority of Buckles v. State of New York (221 N. Y. 418).

The filing of the claim itself, even within six months, is not equivalent to the filing of the written notice of intention to file a claim against the state provided for by section 264 of the Code of Civil Procedure. (Curry v. City of Buffalo, 135 N. Y. 366.)

Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Cuddeback, Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ., concur; Hogan, J., concurs in result.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butterfield v. . the State of New York, 117 N.E. 940, 221 N.Y. 701, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1573 (N.Y. 1917).

117 N.E. 940 (Butterfield v. . the State of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sowma v. State
203 Misc. 1105 (New York State Court of Claims, 1953)
Harvey Chalmers & Son, Inc. v. State
271 A.D.2d 699 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947)
A. W. Banko, Inc. v. State
186 Misc. 491 (New York State Court of Claims, 1946)
Edlux Construction Corp. v. State
252 A.D. 373 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)
Blauvelt v. State
160 Misc. 319 (New York State Court of Claims, 1936)
Hood v. State
113 Misc. 404 (New York State Court of Claims, 1920)
American Woolen Co. v. State
110 Misc. 413 (New York State Court of Claims, 1920)
Rogers v. State
184 A.D. 340 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918)