Butterfield v. Howe
19 Wend. 86
This text of 19 Wend. 86 (Butterfield v. Howe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Butterfield v. Howe, 19 Wend. 86 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1837).
Opinion
Anon.
An attorney is not bound to take a letter from the post -office charged with postage, though he has reason to believe it contains law papers, and the effect of his omission is a default of his adversary.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Texas Express Co. v. Scott
2 Wilson 59 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1883)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
19 Wend. 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butterfield-v-howe-nysupct-1837.