Butt v. Toledo, Wabash, & Western Railway Co.
This text of 34 Ind. 162 (Butt v. Toledo, Wabash, & Western Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This suit was brought by the appellant against the appellee, to recover damages for killing stock on her-railroad. The issues were regularly made; trial by the court,-and .finding and judgment for the defendant Motion .for a.new trial overruled, exceptions, and appeal to this court. The -.only question before us in this record is the correctness of the finding of the court below on the evidence, all of which . is in the record. The evidence was all oral and unwritten, rand is conflicting and contradictory; and the judge who tried the case was Better able to determine its strength, weight, and the .reliability of witnesses than we are; and therefore we cannot reverse, but must affirm the judgment.
Judgment affirmed, at the costs of the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 Ind. 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butt-v-toledo-wabash-western-railway-co-ind-1870.