Butross Dawood Fashho v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 2, 2021·No. 162183·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

June 2, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

162183 Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh

BUTROSS DAWOOD FASHHO, Elizabeth M. Welch, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices

v SC: 162183 COA: 349519 Macomb CC: 2018-000408-NF LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 17, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

ZAHRA and CLEMENT, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 2, 2021

b0526

Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butross Dawood Fashho v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, (Mich. 2021).

Butross Dawood Fashho v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Butross Dawood Fashho v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.