Butler v. Wilson
This text of 564 F. App'x 736 (Butler v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Arthur Lee Butler, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order dismissing Butler’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition for lack of jurisdiction. Butler’s petition sought retroactive application of the Fair Sentencing Act’s statutory mandatory minimum sentences. Butler was sentenced prior to the effective date of the Act. We have reviewed the record and the arguments on appeal and conclude that Butler’s claim is without merit. See United States v. Bullard, 645 F.3d 237, 248-49 (4th Cir.2011). Accordingly, we grant permission to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
564 F. App'x 736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-v-wilson-ca4-2014.