Butler v. Warden
This text of Butler v. Warden (Butler v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6052
JAMES A. BUTLER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WARDEN; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-4102-1-WMN)
Submitted: September 17, 2004 Decided: December 21, 2004
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James A. Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Wayne Mellady, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Annapolis Junction, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
James A. Butler appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his Federal Tort Claims Act suit. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Butler v. Warden,
No. CA-02-4102-1-WMN (D. Md. Oct. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Butler v. Warden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-v-warden-ca4-2004.