Butler v. Warden

Fourth Circuit

Butler v. Warden

117 F. App'x 889

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 21, 2004·No. No. 04-6052·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James A. Butler appeals the district court’s order dismissing his Federal Tort Claims Act suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Butler v. Warden, No. CA-02-102-1-WMN (D.Md. Oct. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

James A. Butler appeals the district court’s order dismissing his Federal Tort Claims Act suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Butler v. Warden, No. CA-02-102-1-WMN (D.Md. Oct. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Butler v. Warden, 117 F. App'x 889 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

117 F. App'x 889 (Butler v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.