Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Butler v. Third Avenue Railroad

Butler v. Third Avenue Railroad

16 Misc. 679, 37 N.Y.S. 651, 73 N.Y. St. Rep. 245
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1896
StatusPublished

This text of 16 Misc. 679 (Butler v. Third Avenue Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Butler v. Third Avenue Railroad, 16 Misc. 679, 37 N.Y.S. 651, 73 N.Y. St. Rep. 245 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1896).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The return shows the usual conflict of evidence found in negligence cases.

The evidence was sufficient to warrant the justice in finding that the injuries complained of were the result of the defendant’s negligence, and that the plaintiff' was free from fault. The damages allowed were fully substantiated. .

We find no error.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Present: MoAdam and Bisohoff, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Misc. 679, 37 N.Y.S. 651, 73 N.Y. St. Rep. 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-v-third-avenue-railroad-nyappterm-1896.