Butler v. TDOC
This text of Butler v. TDOC (Butler v. TDOC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
C H A R L E S A . B U T L E R ) C / A N o . 0 1 A 0 1 - 9 8 0 8 - C H - 0 0 4 2 8 ) D A V I D S O N C O U N T Y P e t i t i o n e r - A p p e l l a n t ) C h a n c e r y N o . 9 8 - 9 8 4 - I ) v .
T E N N E S S E E D E P A R T M E N T O F ) ) ) FILED C O R R E C T I O N ) ) June 29, 1999 R e s p o n d e n t - A p p e l l e e ) Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Court Clerk
I N T H E C O U R T O F A P P E A L S A T N A S H V I L L E
A P P E A L E D F R O M T H E C H A N C E R Y C O U R T O F D A V I D S O N C O U N T Y
T H E H O N O R A B L E I R V I N H . K I L C R E A S E , J R . , C H A N C E L L O R
C h a r l e s A . B u t l e r , P r o S e # 1 3 6 4 7 9 N E C X P O B 5 0 0 0 M o u n t a i n C i t y , T N 3 7 6 8 3
F o r P e t i t i o n e r - A p p e l l a n t
P a u l G . S u m m e r s A t t o r n e y G e n e r a l a n d R e p o r t e r
M i c h a e l E . M o o r e S o l i c i t o r G e n e r a l
S t e p h a n i e R . R e e v e r s , B P R 1 0 5 8 7 S e n i o r C o u n s e l C i v i l R i g h t s a n d C l a i m s D i v i s i o n 4 2 5 F i f t h A v e n u e N o r t h S e c o n d F l o o r , C o r d e l l H u l l B u i l d i n g N a s h v i l l e , T N 3 7 2 4 3 - 0 4 8 8
A t t o r n e y s f o r R e s p o n d e n t - A p p e l l e e
A F F I R M E D A N D R E M A N D E D
H o u s t o n M . G o d d a r d , P r e s i d i n g J u d g e
C O N C U R :
F R A N K S , J . S U S A N O , J . O P I N I O N
P l a i n t i f f C h a r l e s A . B u t l e r , a n i n m a t e i n c a r c e r a t e d i n
t h e p e n a l s y s t e m o f t h e S t a t e o f T e n n e s s e e , s e e k s t o h a v e a
p a r o l e v i o l a t i o n d e t a i n e r i s s u e d b y t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g i a l o d g e d
w i t h t h e T e n n e s s e e D e p a r t m e n t o f C o r r e c t i o n s d e c l a r e d i n v a l i d .
A s b e s t w e u n d e r s t a n d t h e r e c o r d , t h e b a s i s f o r M r . B u t l e r ’ s
a s s e r t i o n i s t h a t t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g i a f a i l e d t o b r i n g h i m t o
t r i a l w i t h i n 1 8 0 d a y s a f t e r h i s r e q u e s t a s m a n d a t e d b y t h e
I n t e r s t a t e C o m p a c t O n D e t a i n e r s .
T h e T r i a l C o u r t f o u n d , w i t h c i t a t i o n s o f a p p r o p r i a t e
a u t h o r i t y , t h a t t h e C o m p a c t d o e s n o t a p p l y t o p a r o l e v i o l a t i o n s ,
a n d f o r t h a t r e a s o n d i s m i s s e d M r . B u t l e r ’ s s u i t .
O u r r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d p e r s u a d e s u s t h i s i s a n
a p p r o p r i a t e c a s e f o r a f f i r m a n c e u n d e r R u l e 1 0 ( a ) o f t h i s C o u r t .
F o r t h e f o r e g o i n g r e a s o n s t h e j u d g m e n t o f t h e T r i a l
C o u r t i s a f f i r m e d a n d t h e c a u s e r e m a n d e d f o r c o l l e c t i o n o f c o s t s
b e l o w . C o s t s o f a p p e a l a r e a d j u d g e d a g a i n s t M r . B u t l e r .
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ H o u s t o n M . G o d d a r d , P . J .
2 C O N C U R :
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ H e r s c h e l P . F r a n k s , J .
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ C h a r l e s D . S u s a n o , J r . , J .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Butler v. TDOC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-v-tdoc-tennctapp-1999.