Butler v. State

790 S.W.2d 661, 1990 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 118, 1990 WL 82817
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 20, 1990
Docket70745
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 790 S.W.2d 661 (Butler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Butler v. State, 790 S.W.2d 661, 1990 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 118, 1990 WL 82817 (Tex. 1990).

Opinion

*662 OPINION

WHITE, Judge.

Appeal is taken from a conviction for capital murder. Y.T.C.A., Penal Code, § 19.03(a)(2). After finding appellant guilty, the jury returned affirmative findings to the special issues submitted to them pursuant to Art. 37.071, V.A.C.C.P. Punishment was assessed at death.

Appellant has filed a brief raising ten points of error. In his sixth point of error, appellant alleges the trial court erred when it failed to file findings of fact and conclusions of law following a hearing in which the trial court denied appellant’s motion to suppress several purported confessions. Appellant states this Court is required’ to abate this appeal and direct the trial court to prepare and file the findings of fact and conclusions of law mandated by Art. 38.22, § 6, V.A.C.C.P. Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779, at 783-784 (Tex.Cr.App.1987), cert. denied 485 U.S. 938, 108 S.Ct. 1117, 99 L.Ed.2d 278 and Harris v. State, 771 S.W.2d 10 (Tex.App.—San Antonio, 1989). In its reply brief, the State agrees with appellant’s sixth point of error that this appeal should be abated while the trial court files its findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding appellant’s confession. The State argues that an abatement is the most relief that appellant should receive on this point.

This Court orders the appeal in the instant cause be abated. This cause is remanded to the trial court to make the findings of fact and conclusions of law called for by Art. 38.22, § 6, V.A.C.C.P. Following that, the trial court shall promptly forward the properly perfected record to this Court.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Butler v. Quarterman
576 F. Supp. 2d 805 (S.D. Texas, 2008)
Donald Keith Dennis v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003
Blount v. State
64 S.W.3d 451 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)
Leonard Wayne Blount v. State of Texas
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001
Butler v. State
872 S.W.2d 227 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1994)
Hai Hai Vuong v. State
830 S.W.2d 929 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
790 S.W.2d 661, 1990 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 118, 1990 WL 82817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-v-state-texcrimapp-1990.