Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas/Butler v. State

Butler v. State

153 S.W. 622, 69 Tex. Crim. 232, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 81
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Butler v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 64 Tex. Crim. 482 →
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 29, 1913·No. No. 2236.·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

On motion of the Assistant Attorney-General the appeal in this case must be dismissed. The recognizance is insufficient in that it fails to state the amount of the punishment. The statute requires that this shall be done.

For the reason indicated the motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained. *

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butler v. State, 153 S.W. 622, 69 Tex. Crim. 232, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 81 (Tex. 1913).

153 S.W. 622 (Butler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.