Butler v. State

1911 OK CR 9, 112 P. 758, 4 Okla. Crim. 637, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 13
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided January 9, 1911·No. No. A-402.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

FURMAN, Presiding Judge.

It has been made known to this court that appellant has applied to the Governor of the state for a pardon, commutation, or parole. Such action upon the part of appellant amounts to an abandonment of the appeal. An appellant cannot invoke the judgment of this court upon the merits of hi& appeal, and while such appeal is pending apply to the Governor of the state for a pardon, commutation, or parole; such action is simply trifling with this court and will not be permitted. It having been made known to us that the appellant in this case has applied to the Governor of the state for a pardon, commutation, or parole, the appeal is dismissed.

DOYLE, Judge, concurs. Judge Richardson presided at the trial of this case in the court below, and took no part in the 'Consideration or disposition of the case in this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butler v. State, 1911 OK CR 9, 112 P. 758, 4 Okla. Crim. 637, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 13 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

1911 OK CR 9 (Butler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ables v. State
1926 OK CR 291 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1926)
Stanfield v. State
1923 OK CR 135 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1923)