Butler v. State

23 S.E. 822, 97 Ga. 404
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 27, 1896·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. Where, upon, being arraigned on an accusation in a city court, the accused waived being indicted by the grand jury, he cannot thereafter in that court withdraw this waiver, but must go to trial upon the accusation.

2. Although when such case was first called the accused declined to have counsel appointed to defend him and also waived his right to be tried by a jury, the court could, with propriety, upon a subsequent day appoint counsel for the accused; and when this was done, and such counsel promptly moved to withdraw the previous waiver of trial by jury, the motion should have been granted, it not appearing that the State’s counsel made any point as to delay, or otherwise insisted that the granting of the motion would result in any prejudice to the State. See Brown et al. v. The State, 89 Ga. 340, and authorities there cited. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butler v. State, 23 S.E. 822, 97 Ga. 404 (Ga. 1896).

23 S.E. 822 (Butler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fleming v. State
229 S.E.2d 800 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
Stevenson v. State
324 N.E.2d 509 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1975)
State v. Jones
312 A.2d 281 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1973)
People v. Melton
271 P.2d 962 (California Court of Appeal, 1954)
Wilson v. State
4 S.E.2d 688 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
State v. Rankin
127 A. 916 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1925)
People v. Standish
185 Ill. App. 485 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1914)
Cain v. State
29 S.E. 426 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)