Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Butler v. State

Butler v. State

125 So. 3d 234, 2013 WL 613754, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2785
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 20, 2013·No. No. 4D11-3454·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, without prejudice to Appellant filing a rule 3.800(a) motion to challenge any concurrent habitual felony offender and prison releasee reoffender sentences that are of equal length in violation of Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000). See also Bartee v. State, 28 So.3d 119 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010).

Affirmed.

MAY, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butler v. State, 125 So. 3d 234, 2013 WL 613754, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2785 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

125 So. 3d 234 (Butler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bartee v. State
28 So. 3d 119 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Grant v. State
770 So. 2d 655 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)