Butler v. State

125 So. 3d 234, 2013 WL 613754, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2785
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 20, 2013
DocketNo. 4D11-3454
StatusPublished

This text of 125 So. 3d 234 (Butler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Butler v. State, 125 So. 3d 234, 2013 WL 613754, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2785 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, without prejudice to Appellant filing a rule 3.800(a) motion to challenge any concurrent habitual felony offender and prison releasee reoffender sentences that are of equal length in violation of Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000). See also Bartee v. State, 28 So.3d 119 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010).

Affirmed.

MAY, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bartee v. State
28 So. 3d 119 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Grant v. State
770 So. 2d 655 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 So. 3d 234, 2013 WL 613754, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.