Butler v. State

670 So. 2d 1178, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3344, 1996 WL 148876
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Butler v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 706 So. 2d 100
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 3, 1996·No. No. 94-01805·Published

Opinion

FRANK, Judge.

William Butler was convicted of battery and resisting an officer without violence. He was sentenced to consecutive one-year terms of probation. His counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record has failed to disclose any reversible error. Thus, we affirm Butler’s convictions. The state, however, has indicated that the sentencing documents contain a scrivener’s error; Butler’s terms of probation should run concurrently and not consecutively.

To this extent, we remand for correction of the error and note that Butler need not be present.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butler v. State, 670 So. 2d 1178, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3344, 1996 WL 148876 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

670 So. 2d 1178 (Butler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)