Butler v. State

343 So. 2d 93
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 8, 1977
Docket76-597
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 343 So. 2d 93 (Butler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Butler v. State, 343 So. 2d 93 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

343 So.2d 93 (1977)

James BUTLER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-597.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 8, 1977.

William J. Brown, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Ira N. Loewy, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

*94 Before HENDRY, C.J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, James Butler, was charged in a four-count information as follows: conspiracy to commit robbery, Count One; aggravated assault, Count Two; robbery, Count Three; and unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal transaction, Count Four.

A jury found him guilty as to all counts of the information. The court sentenced him to consecutive prison terms of fifteen (15) years, fifteen (15) years, and ninety-nine (99) years on Counts One, Two and Three, respectively; as to Count Four, he was sentenced to fifteen (15) years to run concurrently with the sentence imposed as to Count Three. This appeal is from the judgment and sentences.

We have carefully considered the record on appeal, briefs and arguments of counsel and are of the opinion that the judgment appealed is substantially free of error and should be affirmed. We note, however, that aggravated assault, Section 784.021, Florida Statutes (1975) is a felony of the third degree carrying a sentence not exceeding five (5) years. Section 775.082, Florida Statutes (1975).

In exceeding the maximum sentence allowed for that particular crime, we believe the trial judge committed fundamental error which should be corrected, notwithstanding the failure of appellant to raise the illegality of his sentence in the trial court. Williams v. State, 280 So.2d 518 (Fla.3d DCA 1973).

As pertains to Count Two, aggravated assault, the sentence imposed is reversed and remanded with directions to resentence appellant in accordance with the applicable statutory limitations. In all other respects, the judgment and sentences are affirmed.

Affirmed in part; reversed and remanded in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leone v. State
590 So. 2d 29 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Torres v. State
474 So. 2d 335 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Richardson v. State
473 So. 2d 26 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Fenn v. State
398 So. 2d 1004 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Gonzalez v. State
392 So. 2d 334 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Skinner v. State
366 So. 2d 486 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Williams v. State
358 So. 2d 187 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
343 So. 2d 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-v-state-fladistctapp-1977.