Butler v. State

185 So. 620, 135 Fla. 759, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1766
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 4, 1939·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The writ of error brings for review judgment of conviction of the larceny of a steer.

The only question presented is a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction.

The record has been examined and we find there reflected ample evidence to support the verdict and find no reversible error shown therein.

So the judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butler v. State, 185 So. 620, 135 Fla. 759, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1766 (Fla. 1939).

185 So. 620 (Butler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tomasella v. Spano
9 So. 2d 465 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1942)