Butler v. State

457 So. 2d 356, 1984 Ala. LEXIS 4620
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided September 14, 1984·No. 83-803·Published

Opinion

SHORES, Justice.

In quashing the writ, we note the fact that although the conviction for theft of property in the second degree is a nullity (having been announced after the jury was dismissed and after the defendant had left the courtroom, Hayes v. State, 107 Ala. 1, 18 So. 172 (1894)), this in no way affects the sentence of the defendant under the Habitual Felony Offender Act for burglary in the third degree, the defendant having been convicted of two prior felonies.

WRIT QUASHED.

MADDOX, JONES, EMBRY, BEATTY and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butler v. State, 457 So. 2d 356, 1984 Ala. LEXIS 4620 (Ala. 1984).

457 So. 2d 356 (Butler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hayes v. State
107 Ala. 1 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1894)