Butler v. State
This text of 130 Ala. 127 (Butler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The affidavit or sworn complaint made before the justice of the peace initiating this prosecution, and upon Avhich Butler was tried in the justice’s court, is wholly insufficient as the basis for a warrant of arrest, or further prosecution of the defendant, for that it is not the affirmation of the existence of probable cause for believing and the belief of affiant, but the affirmation of his mere opinion that the offense of larceny of four sheep has been committed and [129]*129that William Butler is guilty thereof. Such a complaint will not support the judgment of the justice, nor the statement filed by the solicitor in the county court nor the judgment of the county court. The judgment of the county 'Court is invalid, and no valid judgment can be rendered on this complaint.—Johnson v. State, 82 Ala. 29; Miles v. State, 94 Ala. 106. That judgment is, therefore, reversed and set aside, and a judgment will be here entered discharging the defendant.
Beversed and rendered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
130 Ala. 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-v-state-ala-1900.