Butler v. Shearin

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: May 27, 2008
• Docket: 06-7905
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7905

JAMES A. BUTLER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SHEARIN, Warden; A W BOGDAN; BRADFORD; MECCA; BOYCE; NURSE SMITH; ELAYAN; FORSTER, PA; L. LONG; SOE HART; COX; COSGROVE; W M PUGH; OFFICER DUVALL; MCGORTY, FS Admin; NAVELANCY, A-2 Counselor; LAMBERT; SIGNES; MR. SERVOSS, Assistant Food Services Manager; WHITTINGTON, A-1 Unit Secretary; CORRECTIONS OFFICER SMITH; R. COSGROVE; W. COX; MARBARUK, Clinical Director; S. DEWALT, Warden, sued in their individual and official capacity; DAVID EZEKIAL, A-1 Unit Manager; JONES, A-1 Unit Officer,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

H. SERVICES ADMINISTRATION; NURSE WILLIAMS; CLINICAL DIRECTOR; S. CRUMP; MOST; JANE DOE; JOHN DOE, Jr.; T. HART; SOE; ELAWAN; J. BANEY,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William N. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:04-cv-02496-WMN)

Submitted: May 22, 2008 Decided: May 27, 2008 Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James A. Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael DiBiagio, United States Attorney, Allen F. Loucks, Assistant United States Attorney, Ariana Wright Arnold, Neil Ray White, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; Jennifer Wright Schick, Assistant United States Attorney, Ellicott City, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

James A. Butler appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Butler v.

Shearin, No. 1:04-cv-02496-WMN (D. Md. Aug. 29, 2006). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -