Butler v. Saul
This text of Butler v. Saul (Butler v. Saul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
) HARRY BUTLER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 20-1919 (RMM) ) ANDREW M. SAUL, ) ) Defendant. ) )
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Plaintiff Harry Butler (“Plaintiff” or “Mr. Butler”) seeks reversal of a decision by the
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration in which an Administrative Law Judge
(“ALJ”) denied Mr. Butler’s application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental
security income. See Compl., ECF No. 1. Upon written consent of the parties, this case was
referred to the undersigned for all purposes. See Apr. 12, 2021 Min. Order.
On May 12, 2021, Mr. Butler moved for judgment of reversal (“Motion for Judgment of
Reversal”). See Pl.’s Mot. J. Reversal, ECF No. 14. On May 27, 2021, Defendant Andrew M.
Saul (“Commissioner”) moved, with Mr. Butler’s consent, for entry of judgment that reverses the
Commissioner’s final decision and remands this matter for further administrative proceedings,
pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (“Motion to Remand”). See Def’s Mot. Remand,
ECF No. 15. Upon remand, the parties agree that the ALJ should (1) further develop the record,
if necessary, (2) offer Mr. Butler an opportunity for another hearing, and (3) issue a new
decision. See id. at 1. Under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Court has the power “to enter, upon the
pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision
of the Commissioner, with or without remanding the cause for a hearing.” Shalala v. Schaefer,
509 U.S. 292, 296 n.1 (1993). Having considered the parties’ submissions,1 the relevant case
law and statutory provisions, and the record of this case as a whole, the Court GRANTS the
Commissioner’s Motion to Remand. The final decision of the Commissioner is reversed, and
this matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings, pursuant to sentence four
of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Further, given this order
granting the Commissioner’s Motion to Remand, the Court DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff’s
Motion for Judgment of Reversal.
06/09/2021 Date: _____________ Signed: ____________________
1 Pl.’s Mot. J. Reversal; Def.’s Mot. Remand.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Butler v. Saul, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-v-saul-dcd-2021.