Butler v. Price
110 Mass. 97
Opinion
If the letter put- in evidence was proved to have been written by the defendant’s wife, yet there was no evi [98]*98dence that the defendant authorized her to write it or to make a payment upon the note in suit. Such authority cannot be inferred from the relation of husband and wife. The court, therefore, should have ruled, as requested, that there was not sufficient evidence to warrant a verdict for the plaintiff.
Exceptions sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Butler v. Price, 110 Mass. 97 (Mass. 1872).
110 Mass. 97 (Butler v. Price) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Keota Mills & Elevator v. Gamble
2010 OK 12 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2010)
Arthur & Co. v. Burke
145 P. 974 (Washington Supreme Court, 1915)
Good v. Ehrlich
72 P. 545 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1903)