Butler v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided December 28, 2020·No. 2:20-cv-00861·Unknown

Opinion

1 Erica J. Chee Nevada Bar No. 12238 2 erica.chee@ogletreedeakins.com 3 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. Wells Fargo Tower 4 Suite 1500 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway 5 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: 702.369.6800 6 Fax: 702.369.6888 7 Attorney for Defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 DELANIE BUTLER and JOHN ROBINSON, Case No.: 2:20-cv-00861-JCM-EJY individually and on behalf of all similarly 12 situated class and collective action members, 13 Plaintiffs, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 14 vs. 15 PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; 16 DOES I through X, inclusive; ROE CORPORATIONS I through X inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 19 In order to protect the confidentiality of confidential, private, and personal information 20 obtained by the Parties in connection with this case, the Parties hereby agree to the entry of this 21 Stipulated Protective Order submitted by Plaintiffs DELANIE BUTLER and JOHN ROBINSON, 22 individually and on behalf of all similarly situated class and collective action members (“Plaintiffs”) 23 and Defendant PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC (“Defendant”) (hereinafter 24 collectively referred to as “Parties”), by which the Parties agree, and the Court finds, pursuant to 25 FRCP 26(c), that good cause exists to support the entry of a protective order over the discovery and dissemination of certain information deemed confidential by one of the Parties. This Stipulated 26 Protective Order will expedite the disclosure of information and production of documents protected 27 by privilege or statutes, preserve the confidentiality of such information, protect privacy interests 1 of the Parties and non-parties, and help to avoid potential discovery disputes related to information 2 that is designated confidential. The Court, being fully advised, hereby ORDERS as follows: 3 GENERAL PROVISIONS 4 1. In this action, at least one of the Parties has sought and/or is seeking discovery of 5 Confidential Material (as defined in paragraph 5 below). This Protective Order shall apply to all 6 documents, materials, and information that is sought by a party either from other parties to this 7 litigation or from any third party with possession or custody of Confidential Material during 8 discovery, including without limitation, documents produced, answers to interrogatories, responses 9 to requests for admission, deposition testimony, and other information disclosed pursuant to the 10 disclosure or discovery duties created by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Parties assert 11 the disclosure of Confidential Material outside the scope of this litigation could result in significant 12 injury to one or more of the Parties’ business or personal privacy interests, and/or could result in 13 significant injury to a third party’s privacy interests, as well as potentially impacting or resulting in 14 the inadvertent waiver of the attorney-client privilege. The Parties have entered into this Stipulation 15 and request the Court enter this Protective Order for the purpose of preventing the disclosure and 16 use of Confidential Material except as set forth herein, and to prevent the inadvertent waiver of any 17 applicable privilege. 18 2. As used in this Protective Order, “document” is defined as designated in FRCP 19 34(a)(1)(A). A draft or non-identical copy is a separate document within the meaning of this term. 20 3. This Protective Order may be modified by the Court at any time for good cause 21 shown following notice to all Parties and an opportunity for them to be heard. 22 4. Nothing in this Protective Order shall prevent any party or other person from seeking 23 modification of this Order, from objecting to discovery that the party or other person believes to be 24 improper, or from filing a motion with respect to the manner in which Confidential Material shall 25 be treated at trial. Moreover, nothing in this Protective Order shall prejudice the right of any party to contest the alleged relevancy, admissibility, or discoverability of information designated as 26 Confidential Material or information sought in discovery. 27 28 1 CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL 2 5. “Confidential Material” means those documents, personal information, trade secrets, 3 or sensitive commercial information that the designating party believes to be protected by law, 4 including FRCP 26, and is designated by one of the Parties in the manner provided in paragraph 15 5 below, the disclosure of which the designating party believes may implicate the privacy interests of 6 Plaintiffs, Defendant, third parties and/or information contained in confidential business records 7 and communications by the designating party or a third party with possession or custody of such 8 information. Any information designated by a party as confidential will first be reviewed by 9 counsel, and designation will be based on a good faith belief that the information is confidential and 10 entitled to protection under the law, including Rule 26. The documents or information so designated 11 shall be deemed “Confidential Material” subject to this Protective Order. Confidential Material 12 does not include (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a 13 Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a 14 result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public 15 record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the 16 disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the 17 information lawfully and was not under any obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. 18 6. Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party 19 or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to 20 limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. The 21 Designating Party must designate for protection only those pages of a document which qualify as 22 Confidential Material, in order to avoid sweeping an entire document unjustifiably within the ambit 23 of this Order, where only some pages contain Confidential Material. Nevertheless, where the 24 burden of designating individual pages of a document would outweigh the benefit to full and open 25 proceedings, the entire document may be designated confidential. Indiscriminate designations of 26 confidentiality, however, are inconsistent with this Order. If it comes to a Designating Party’s 27 attention that information or items that it designated for protection do not qualify for protection, 28 that Designating Party must promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken 1 designation. 2 7. Confidential Material shall not be disclosed to any person or entity not a party to this 3 lawsuit except as expressly provided herein. Confidential Material shall only be used by the Parties 4 in this lawsuit, including any appeal. Confidential Material shall not be disclosed to any person or 5 entity other than the Parties to this suit, counsel who have entered an appearance in this case and 6 their staff, judges, magistrates, law clerks and other clerical personnel of the Court before which the 7 action is pending, and other individuals as designated in paragraph 11 of this Protective Order. 8 8.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butler v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, (D. Nev. 2020).

Butler v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (Butler v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Lowell M. Birrell
447 F.2d 1168 (Second Circuit, 1971)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)