Butler v. NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, NYT
Opinion
Samuel Clark BUTLER, Appellant,
Gabe Kaimowitz, Cross Appellant-Proposed Intervenor,
v.
The NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, NYT Management Services, Inc., d/b/a The Gainesville Sun, Janine Young Sikes, and Cindy Swirko, Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
*1173 Manuel Socias of Gary, Williams, Parenti, Finney, Lewis, McManus, Watson & Sperando, P.I., Orlando; Willie Gary, Maria Sperando, Tricia Hoffler, and Debra Nolan, of Gary, Williams, Parenti, Finney, Lewis, McManus, Watson & Sperando, P.L., Stuart, for Appellant Samuel Clark Butler. Gabe Kaimowitz, pro se, Cross Appellant-Proposed Intervenor.
Larry G. Turner of Turner and Jones, Gainesville; Gregg D. Thomas, James J. McGuire and Rachel Fugate of Thomas and Locicero, PL, Tampa, for Appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the appellee's Motion to Dismiss Cross-Appellant/Proposed Intervenor's Appeal, as well as the cross-appellant's response thereto, the Court has determined that the cross-appeal should be dismissed. The appellant's cross-appeal is an untimely attempt to invoke the Court's jurisdiction to review the lower tribunal's October 24, 2005, Order Striking Motion for Intervention. Accordingly, the motion is granted and the cross-appeal is hereby. dismissed.
KAHN, PADOVANO, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
973 So. 2d 1172 (Butler v. NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, NYT) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.