Butler v. NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, NYT
This text of 973 So. 2d 1172 (Butler v. NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, NYT) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Samuel Clark BUTLER, Appellant,
Gabe Kaimowitz, Cross Appellant-Proposed Intervenor,
v.
The NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, NYT Management Services, Inc., d/b/a The Gainesville Sun, Janine Young Sikes, and Cindy Swirko, Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
*1173 Manuel Socias of Gary, Williams, Parenti, Finney, Lewis, McManus, Watson & Sperando, P.I., Orlando; Willie Gary, Maria Sperando, Tricia Hoffler, and Debra Nolan, of Gary, Williams, Parenti, Finney, Lewis, McManus, Watson & Sperando, P.L., Stuart, for Appellant Samuel Clark Butler. Gabe Kaimowitz, pro se, Cross Appellant-Proposed Intervenor.
Larry G. Turner of Turner and Jones, Gainesville; Gregg D. Thomas, James J. McGuire and Rachel Fugate of Thomas and Locicero, PL, Tampa, for Appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the appellee's Motion to Dismiss Cross-Appellant/Proposed Intervenor's Appeal, as well as the cross-appellant's response thereto, the Court has determined that the cross-appeal should be dismissed. The appellant's cross-appeal is an untimely attempt to invoke the Court's jurisdiction to review the lower tribunal's October 24, 2005, Order Striking Motion for Intervention. Accordingly, the motion is granted and the cross-appeal is hereby. dismissed.
KAHN, PADOVANO, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
973 So. 2d 1172, 2007 WL 3085008, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-v-new-york-times-company-nyt-fladistctapp-2007.