Butler v. Moubarak

435 F. App'x 271
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 20, 2011·No. No. 10-7537·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James A. Butler appeals the district court’s orders denying relief and reconsideration on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971) and the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Butler v. Moubarak, No. 1:07-cv-00463-WMN (D. Md. Sept. 21, 2009 & Sept. 7, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butler v. Moubarak, 435 F. App'x 271 (4th Cir. 2011).

435 F. App'x 271 (Butler v. Moubarak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related