Butler v. M'Intyre
2 Johns. 182
This text of 2 Johns. 182 (Butler v. M'Intyre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Butler v. M'Intyre, 2 Johns. 182 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1807).
Opinion
If the justice returns precisely and specifically as to all the facts stated in the affidavit on which the certiorari was allowed, it is enough. The law has, in this respect, given a sufficient remedy to the party aggrieved. It would be inconvenient to require the ju s tice to answer to supplementary affidavits.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rourk v. Murphy
12 Abb. N. Cas. 402 (New York Supreme Court, 1883)
Draude v. Rohrer Christian Manufacturing Co.
9 Mo. App. 249 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1880)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Johns. 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-v-mintyre-nysupct-1807.