Butler v. M'Intyre
2 Johns. 182
Opinion
If the justice returns precisely and specifically as to all the facts stated in the affidavit on which the certiorari was allowed, it is enough. The law has, in this respect, given a sufficient remedy to the party aggrieved. It would be inconvenient to require the ju s tice to answer to supplementary affidavits.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Butler v. M'Intyre, 2 Johns. 182 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1807).
2 Johns. 182 (Butler v. M'Intyre) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rourk v. Murphy
12 Abb. N. Cas. 402 (New York Supreme Court, 1883)
Draude v. Rohrer Christian Manufacturing Co.
9 Mo. App. 249 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1880)