Butler v. Michigan
352 U.S. 922, 77 S. Ct. 218
Opinion
Appeal from the Recorder’s Court of the City pf Detroit, Michigan. (Prob-able jurisdiction noted, 350 TJ. S. 963.) The motion of David S. Alberts for leave to file petition to intervene, or in the alternative, for consolidation of this case with Alberts v. California, No. 61, October Term, 1956, is denied. The movant is granted leave to file a further memorandum in No. 61.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Butler v. Michigan, 352 U.S. 922, 77 S. Ct. 218 (1956).
352 U.S. 922 (Butler v. Michigan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Southern Pacific Company, Successor and Assign of Texas and New Orleans Railroad Company v. Ruth Matthews, Et Vir
335 F.2d 924 (Fifth Circuit, 1964)
Tom Walton v. Marlen R. Owens and Yale and Towne Manufacturing Company
244 F.2d 383 (Fifth Circuit, 1957)