Butler v. MCKNIGHT PLACE PARTNERSHIP

Missouri Court of Appeals

Butler v. MCKNIGHT PLACE PARTNERSHIP

295 S.W.3d 874, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1525, 2009 WL 3444783

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 27, 2009·No. ED 92224·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

George Butler, Jr. appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (Commission) decision finding that he was disqualified for unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the Commission’s decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence. Section 288.210 RSMo 2006. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memoran *875 dum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

George Butler, Jr. appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (Commission) decision finding that he was disqualified for unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the Commission’s decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence. Section 288.210 RSMo 2006. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memoran *875 dum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Butler v. MCKNIGHT PLACE PARTNERSHIP, 295 S.W.3d 874, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1525, 2009 WL 3444783 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

295 S.W.3d 874 (Butler v. MCKNIGHT PLACE PARTNERSHIP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.