Butler v. Lincoln Hospital & Home
Opinion
The bill of particulars served by the plaintiff charges that Dr. Cooley and the superintendent of the defendant hospital made the charge of insanity against the plaintiff. The objection by plaintiff that the bill of particulars cannot be considered on a motion for judgment on the pleadings is untenable. See Dineen v. May, 149 App. Div. 469, 134 N. Y. Supp. 7. It appears from the pleadings that the defendant is a charitable organization, and is not liable for the tortious acts of its physicians and servants. Schloendorff v. Soc’y of N. Y. Hospital, 211 N. Y. 125, 105 N. E. 92, 52 L. R. A. (N. S.) 505, Ann. Cas. 1915C, 581. The motion for judgment must be granted. Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
155 N.Y.S. 1001 (Butler v. Lincoln Hospital & Home) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.