Butler v. Lincoln Hospital & Home

New York Supreme Court

Butler v. Lincoln Hospital & Home

155 N.Y.S. 1001

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 26, 1915

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 155 N.Y.S. 1001 (Butler v. Lincoln Hospital & Home) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Butler v. Lincoln Hospital & Home, 155 N.Y.S. 1001 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

NEWBURGER, J.

[1,2] The complaint alleges that the defendant maintained a hospital, and that the plaintiff on the 14th day of December, 1909, was in said hospital, and that he was sent by the defendant to Bellevue Hospital as an insane person, and subsequently . to Ward’s Island, and thereafter to the insane asylum at Middletown, N. Y., where he was confined against, his will until October, 1912 ;• that the act of the defendant was malicious. The answer alleges the incorporation and existence of the defendant for charitable purposes, and admits the transfer of the plaintiff to Bellevue Hospital, and denies that plaintiff was transferred as an insane person, or that the act of the defendant was malicious, but that said transfer was made in the customary manner and on the recommendation of the physician in charge.

The bill of particulars served by the plaintiff charges that Dr. Cooley and the superintendent of the defendant hospital made the charge of insanity against the plaintiff. The objection by plaintiff that the bill of particulars cannot be considered on a motion for judgment on the pleadings is untenable. See Dineen v. May, 149 App. Div. 469, 134 N. Y. Supp. 7. It appears from the pleadings that the defendant is a charitable organization, and is not liable for the tortious acts of its physicians and servants. Schloendorff v. Soc’y of N. Y. Hospital, 211 N. Y. 125, 105 N. E. 92, 52 L. R. A. (N. S.) 505, Ann. Cas. 1915C, 581. The motion for judgment must be granted. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NEWBURGER, J.

[1,2] The complaint alleges that the defendant maintained a hospital, and that the plaintiff on the 14th day of December, 1909, was in said hospital, and that he was sent by the defendant to Bellevue Hospital as an insane person, and subsequently . to Ward’s Island, and thereafter to the insane asylum at Middletown, N. Y., where he was confined against, his will until October, 1912 ;• that the act of the defendant was malicious. The answer alleges the incorporation and existence of the defendant for charitable purposes, and admits the transfer of the plaintiff to Bellevue Hospital, and denies that plaintiff was transferred as an insane person, or that the act of the defendant was malicious, but that said transfer was made in the customary manner and on the recommendation of the physician in charge.

The bill of particulars served by the plaintiff charges that Dr. Cooley and the superintendent of the defendant hospital made the charge of insanity against the plaintiff. The objection by plaintiff that the bill of particulars cannot be considered on a motion for judgment on the pleadings is untenable. See Dineen v. May, 149 App. Div. 469, 134 N. Y. Supp. 7. It appears from the pleadings that the defendant is a charitable organization, and is not liable for the tortious acts of its physicians and servants. Schloendorff v. Soc’y of N. Y. Hospital, 211 N. Y. 125, 105 N. E. 92, 52 L. R. A. (N. S.) 505, Ann. Cas. 1915C, 581. The motion for judgment must be granted. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 N.Y.S. 1001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-v-lincoln-hospital-home-nysupct-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack