Home/New York Supreme Court/Butler v. Lee

Butler v. Lee

32 Barb. 75, 19 How. Pr. 383, 1860 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 90
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 7, 1860
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 32 Barb. 75 (Butler v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Butler v. Lee, 32 Barb. 75, 19 How. Pr. 383, 1860 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 90 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1860).

Opinion

By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

We think that part of the order at special term, appealed from, should be reversed with ten dollars costs. We find neither precedent or principle authorizing that part of the order. (19 N. Y. Rep. 9. 1 Duer, 652. 1 Kern. 575. 3 R. S. 293.) The code (§ 388) and the revised statutes have prescribed a mode in which the defendants and their witnesses can have an inspection of the draft, if necessary, here and within the jurisdiction of this court; but we see no power in the court to compel the plaintiffs to part with their property (the draft) in the manner and for the purposes contemplated by this order.

Order reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kelley v. Weber
9 Abb. N. Cas. 62 (New York Supreme Court, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 Barb. 75, 19 How. Pr. 383, 1860 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-v-lee-nysupct-1860.