Butler v. Kenny Bros.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Butler v. Kenny Bros.

235 A.D. 687

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 235 A.D. 687 (Butler v. Kenny Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Butler v. Kenny Bros., 235 A.D. 687 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

-As to defendants TaylorFiehter Steel Construction Co., Inc., and Pietrowski & Konop Co., judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Cars-well, Scudder and Davis, JJ. As to defendant Kenny Bros., Inc., judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event, the court being of opinion that sufficient facts were shown to require a determina[688]*688tion by the jury. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Scudder, J., dissents and votes to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

-As to defendants TaylorFiehter Steel Construction Co., Inc., and Pietrowski & Konop Co., judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Cars-well, Scudder and Davis, JJ. As to defendant Kenny Bros., Inc., judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event, the court being of opinion that sufficient facts were shown to require a determina[688]*688tion by the jury. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Scudder, J., dissents and votes to affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 A.D. 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-v-kenny-bros-nyappdiv-1932.