Butler v. Kelsey
This text of 15 Johns. 177 (Butler v. Kelsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The inquisition ought to be set aside. The writ was executed on Sunday, within the meaning of the statute. There was no necessity for taking the inquisition on Sunday, as the cause might have been adjourned over until Monday. It is not like the case of a trial at a circuit, where a verdict is sometimes taken on- Sunday morning, because the jury must, otherwise, be kept together during Sunday.
On the second ground, also, the inquisition ought to be set aside. Though the plaintiff’s attorney may have acted with good intentions, and from no improper motive, yet if there is any legal or valid objection to a juror, it ought to be openly and publicly stated, and the sheriff may then .set aside the juror against whom the objection is made, and summon another; or if he should refuse to do so, it would be ground for an application to set aside the inquisition. There must be no interference with the jury or the sheriff.
Motion granted.
Vide Hoghtaling v. Osborn, ante. p. 119.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 Johns. 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-v-kelsey-nysupct-1818.