Butler v. Joint School District No. 4

145 N.W. 180, 155 Wis. 626, 1914 Wisc. LEXIS 54
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided February 3, 1914·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

WiNSLOW, C. J.

The legal propositions decided in this case are:

1. The primary department of a public school does not include the sixth, seventh, and eighth grades, and one who contracts to teach the primary department' cannot be required to teach said grades in their grade work, even though the clasáes be sent to the primary room. If there was any doubt as to [628]*628what gi’ades in our school system are primary grades that doubt is removed by sec. 452c, Stats. 1913, wbicb names the first four grades as such grades.

2. The evidence was sufficient to take to the jury the question whether the board prevented the plaintiff from proceeding to fulfil her contract to teach the primary department. When all the members of the board are present, official action may be taken although the meeting be not formally called or the action formally recorded in the minutes.

By the Gourt. — Judgment reversed, and action remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butler v. Joint School District No. 4, 145 N.W. 180, 155 Wis. 626, 1914 Wisc. LEXIS 54 (Wis. 1914).

145 N.W. 180 (Butler v. Joint School District No. 4) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shulse v. City of Mayville
271 N.W. 643 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1937)
Hlavka v. Common School District No. 83
255 N.W. 820 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1934)
Harris v. Joint School District Number Six
233 N.W. 97 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1930)
Leahy v. Joint School District No. 12
217 N.W. 293 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1928)
School District No. 4 v. Industrial Commission
216 N.W. 844 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1927)