Butler v. Gay

122 So. 2d 189, 1960 Fla. LEXIS 2195
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 20, 1960·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari herein reflected apparent jurisdiction in this court, hence we issued the writ and have now heard oral argument by the respective parties. Upon our further consideration of said argument and briefs heretofore filed by the parties we have determined that there is, in fact, no direct conflict between the decision brought here for review and a former decision of this Court as contended in the petition. Accordingly this court is without jurisdiction in the matter.

Therefore, the writ heretofore issued must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, C. J„ and HOBSON, DREW and THORNAL, JJ., concur. TERRELL, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butler v. Gay, 122 So. 2d 189, 1960 Fla. LEXIS 2195 (Fla. 1960).

122 So. 2d 189 (Butler v. Gay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adams v. SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY
296 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)
Adams v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad
277 So. 2d 578 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)